Comments on: asshat penis extender: json-rpc-java

By: Todd

Todd — Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:32:33 +0000

I extended the servlet, and put that piece of shit bridge in the session on every request (constructed from my REAL serializable session information), and finally {} removed it from the session. Freakin ruined my cluster before I did that!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:05:03 +0000

If nothing else, the title rocks.

By: Anonymous Bastard

Anonymous Bastard — Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:24:23 +0000

Is this what a “shit-eating-grin” looks like?
http://xxxpunkrockerzxxx.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/picture229.jpg
Just wondering…

By: Ron

Ron — Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:11:07 +0000

Ha ha ha, awesome! Hani, did you get some sand in your vagina?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:18:23 +0000

Neko, yiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

By: Habibak

Habibak — Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:16:29 +0000

Inta mahdoum ya habibi. Minoin hader tak?

By: His Holiness John-Paul The Second

His Holiness John-Paul The Second — Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:47:31 +0000

Guys, I’m a little sick and have a hole in my chest, so I’ll be unable to wash any feet this year. I’m delegating that task to my hidden nephew, Bill Berk. Please refer all dirty feet matters to him.

PS: VII + XXXIX = XLVI right ?

By: Dr. Confused

Dr. Confused — Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:31:20 +0000

Oh by the way. JSF sucks!!! (I think 3 years down the line, it will be usable)

By: NickFitz

NickFitz — Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:26:29 +0000

Marc: given that the name is XmlHttpRequest, it’s not surprising you couldn’t find anything. Doing a search at the MSDN library for “windows ce xml”, the page linked from the first result mentions support for XmlHttp in WinCE 3.0.

Oddly enough, that’s the first time I’ve ever got a useful result back from an MSDN search…

By: PA

PA — Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:58:51 +0000

Well, Mr Bile, while json-rpc-java current incarnation is indeed lacking in many aspects, why don’t you startle us with your own wizardly implementation. Anything beside public masturbation will do.

By: Marc Logemann

Marc Logemann — Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:32:30 +0000

I am not quite sure but i think ajax is overhyped especially in the blogger world. You just need some guys pushing a technology who have descent blog traffic and you see thousands of other bloggers following without questioning anything.

I wrote my oppinion about java here:
http://www.logemann.org/blojsom/blog/default/?month=3&day=5&year=2005
But reading silly implementation limitations like these is even more disturbing. Perhaps i am too old to know that javascript will never be painless, no matter how big your JS library is to support different browsers. I recently searched for XmlHttpStream support on various Microsoft embedded OS like Windows CE and i can only say: “good night”.

By: Joe Walker

Joe Walker — Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:03:50 +0000

A much simpler and quicker way to do this sort of thing:
http://eireneh.thorubio.org/dwr/index.html

By: fx

fx — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:51:27 +0000

Why is it that since the thing has a name (“ajax”) _and_ some random TSSS guys caught up with the past and did a presentation on yesteryears technology, everyone has a big fat boner now? It seems that even the lamest idea and technology can be hyped, all it needs is a buzzword. EJB comes to mind. Webservices. SOA. ajax …

By: Witheld on requst

Witheld on requst — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:29:44 +0000

First!